IS THERE WARUM IN A HYPOTHETICAL WORLD?

By impactology

Did Warum 2.0 invite the viewer to engage in the world as an act of perpetual proposition, continually in search of a constant and a point of reconciliation? And more specifically, what would ‘reconciliation’ mean in that situation?

To be further investigated for sure. In any case, the notion of ‘disappearance’ by Paul Virilio, will never cover the whole thing. As the Chinese word says, the notion of the ‘moving image’ says ‘electronic shadow’. This definitely points to its own implications.

Leave a Reply